REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON MEDICINAL PLANTS AND
TRADITIONAL MEDICINE IN AFRICA
BREAKWATER
LODGE C.T.
14 - 18 APRIL 1998
WORKSHOP AGENDA
TUESDAY
14 APRIL
09h00 - 10h15 Opening Session
TRAMSO
ELCI
IDRC
Head
of U.C.T School of Pharmacy (Key Note Address)
Introductions
(Facilitator).
10h15 - 10h30 Tea/Coffee
10h30 -11h00 Introductory Paper
11h00 -13h00 PRESENTATIONS - TOPIC 1
Protection
and conservation of medicinal plants and traditional knowledge and
implementation
of article 8 (j) of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
13h00 -14-00 Lunch
14h00 - 15h00 Discussions
15h00 - 15h30 Tea/Coffee
15h30 - 18h00 Working Group Sessions
18h00 - 20h00 Dinner
20h00 Report
Ready
WEDNESDAY
15 APRIL
08h30 - 10h15 PLENARY TOPIC 1
10h15 - 10h30 Tea/Coffee
10h30 - 13h00 PRESENTATIONS - TOPIC 2
Participatory
research and involvement of Local Communities and
Traditional
healers.
13h00 - 14h00 Lunch
14h00 - 15h00 Discussions
15h00 - 15h30 Tea/Coffee Break
15h30 - 17h30 Working Group Sessions
17h30 - 18h30 Report Production
18h30 Dinner
18h30 Report
typing
THURSDAY
16 APRIL
08h30 - 10h15 PLENARY TOPIC 2
10h15 - 10h30 Tea/Coffee Break
10h30 - 13h30 PRESENTATIONS - TOPIC 3
13h00 - 14h00 Lunch
14h00 - 15h00 Discussions
15h00 - 15h30 Tea/Coffee Working Group Sessions
15h30 - 18h00 Working Group Sessions
18h00 - 20h00 Cocktail
20h00 Report
typing
SATURDAY
18 APRIL
ACTION PLAN AND FOLLOW UP
08h30 - 10h30 Brief Presentations by
1. EL.C.I
2. IRD.C
Plenary
discussion
10h30 - 10h45 Tea/Coffee Break
10h45 - 12h00 Plenary discussion
12h00 - 12h30 Closing
TRAMSO
VOTE
OF THANKS
The workshop focused on the discussion of the four major topics
identified above with each topic being allocated a full day for such
discussion. Discussion was preceded by
two theme presentations by selected participants followed by two to three
support presentations from those participants who had prepared papers on
subject areas falling within these thematic areas. These presentations were used to derive
discussion points which provided a basis for the identification of issues for
consideration during group work sessions.
Group work sessions were then followed by plenary sessions where the
deliberations from the groups were presented.
Plenary sessions were used to identify areas for commonality among
participants on each thematic area.
The workshop was considered useful by many participants as it brought
together researchers, conservationists, traditional and "modern"
medical practitioners to share experiences and discuss ways of integrating
traditional and public health delivery systems.
A lot of research has been carried out in the area of medicinal plants
and traditional medicine with traditional medical practitioners and those with
traditional knowledge on medicinal plants being objects of such research. This situation has resulted in bio-piracy and
the unrewarded exploitation of intellectual property rights on a continent-wide
scale.
Traditional medicine has historically been considered to be
unscientific as medicines prescribed under this system were not standardized as
is the case in western medical systems.
This situation has resulted in the creation of fences between the two
medical delivery systems which has seen the two operating parallel to each
other in a lot of countries in Africa.
The majority of the continent's population exclusively uses the
traditional medical system on account of the system being readily accessible
and less costly. Despite this,
governments in Africa continue to allocate huge sums of money to the
conventional western medical delivery systems which benefit very small sections
of the population.
Traditional medicines organizing
themselves into strong lobby and policy makers in
discussions aimed at achieving greater recognition of this important of medicine. There are already situations where
traditional and western medicine systems are being integrated. These organized bodies are also working with
progressive researchers to standardize traditional medicines.
Traditional medicinal plants are under constant threat from a variety
of pressures emanating largely from population growth, unsustainable harvesting
methods and inequitable terms of international trade. Such losses are threatening not just the
biological resource but traditional knowledge systems as well. There is need, therefore, for revisiting the
whole area of ethnobotanical knowledge systems that encompass the peoples
cultural heritage if the rich medicinal plant resource base of Africa is to be
conserved.
Traditional and conventional medical practices should initiate open
dialogue with a view to addressing the high degree of suspicion that
characterizes the relationship between the two.
Both systems have something to learn from each other in order to facilitate
further development of both sectors.
Research institutions working in the area of medicinal plants and
traditional medical practice should be transparent in their dealings with
traditional medical practitioners. These
institutions should validate their findings with these practitioners, a process
which will assist in changing attitudes amongst all those involved.
Major Results of the
Workshop and Facilitator's Recommendations.
A major achievement of the Cape Town Workshop was the fact that
researchers, academics, conventional western medical practitioners and
traditional medical practitioners were afforded an opportunity to sit together
and deliberate on issues of concern to all of them. A greater understanding of the concerns of
each of the sectors represented at the workshop was realized through the
interaction the workshop provided for.
The workshop provided opportunities for the initiation of a network of
practitioners in this important sector across the whole of Anglophone
Africa. Together with Francophone Africa
which has already been through the same process, a continent-wide network on
traditional medicine and medicinal plants could be set up thereby increasing
the flow of information amongst practitioners on the continent. It is recommended that the network
established through this, be issue based so this area is addressed
systematically.
A lot of information on medicinal plants and traditional medicine is
available across the continent. There is
a need for this information to be donated in a formal for standardization's
sake. Researchers and traditional
medical practitioners should co-ordinate their efforts around this important
issue.
International and regional co-operation in the fields of traditional
medicine will only be effective if they are based upon clear understanding of
national situations. Initiating
co-operation with little or no understanding of local conditions might result
in the perpetuation of current problems of bio-piracy. It is recommended that those countries in
Africa which have not set up formal representative bodies for the traditional
medical practitioners are moving towards setting these up as they are useful in
getting the issues that are important on national medical agenda. Having said that, however, co-operation
should be initiated in the area of sharing of information and experiences at
both scales. This issue is dealt with
more effectively in the section dealing with networking.
Traditional medical practitioners should be more transparent with the
systems they use in their practices.
Greater transparency will facilitate a clearer understanding of
traditional medicine by all those who currently criticize the practice as
unscientific.
Documentation and validation of traditional medicine as well as the
creation of networks for information exchange will require that traditional
medical practitioners themselves be involved in these processes. Further, large
capital injections will be required to facilitate these processes. There is a need, therefore, for ELCI and IDRC
to arrange and initiate a process where practitioners in this sector engage the
international donor community with their own project ideas for funding. Initiatives of this nature on the ground will
go a long way in operationalizing community involvement in the preservation/conservation
of medicinal plant species.
Although gender is apparently not an issue in the area of traditional
medicine as most of the practitioners are women, there is a need for those in
decision making position, affecting the health delivery systems in Africa
remain cognizant of the need to ensure that gender is a significant part of
whatever programs are initiated.
SALIENT
FEATURES OF THE WORKSHOP
TOPIC
1
1.1 PROPER
IDENTIFICATION, DOCUMENTATION OF MEDICINAL
PLANTS
1.2 Sustainable conservation and use of
biodiversity
(medicinal plants)
Monitoring and assessment of wild population and
marketed plants
Recommendations:
· Community gardens
· Initiate media programmes for awareness/information and
communication.
· Collection of genetic resources
· Policy formulation
1.3
· Use community based participatory
research method to identify existing
(threatened) cultural practices that promote sustainable use, management and
conservation of medicinal plants.
Recommendation:
· To undertake participatory/studies in
this regard.
1.4
· Promote and enforce equitable sharing
of benefits arising from the exploitation of local knowledge.
· Implementation of articles 8(j).
Recommendation:
· Undertake research on policy issues
related to article 8(j) of CBD in order to make it applicable within the
African context.
1.5
· To promote better cooperation and
collaboration between the two systems.
1.6 Perceptions
and Attitudes:
·
Mutual recognition and clear consciousness of both medical
systems so that they can operate in
equal relationship.
TOPIC
2
PARTICIPATORY
RESEARCH AND INVOLVEMENT OF LOCAL COMMUNTIES
AND TRADITIONAL HEALERS
2.1 PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH APPROACHES FOR
COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION
· Develop and implement participatory
research methodologies (PRM)
Recommendation:
· Organize training sessions in
participatory research, methodologies for all stakeholders.
2.3 VALIDATION OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE/ MEDICAL
PREPARATIONS
AND PRACTICES
· To develop acceptable and participatory
methods to validate traditional medicine.
RECOMMENDATION:
To
collect,document and implement methods of validation of traditional medicine
practices and products.
2.4 PREPARATION
AND DEVELOPMENT OF WRITTEN NATIONAL
PHARMACOPEA
OF MEDICINAL PLANTS THROUGH INVOLVEMENT
OF ALL
STAKEHOLDERS
· To establish a broadly accessible
pharmacopoeia to assist all those concerned with medicinal plants.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
· Establish a coordinating body/
“steering committee
· Establish a multidisciplinary research
team
· Evaluate the OAU pharmacopoeia ‘s
relevance/adequacy for the country (e.g. in terms of species coverage; coverage
of the major applications of the various plants)
· Identify and collate key sources of
other relevant information (databases; other pharmacopoeia)
· Convene key actors involved: through a
national workshop/meeting
· to identify key areas for research
· to agree on and implement the national
work plan
· to link up with regional groups.
2.5 BIOPIRACY,
BIO-DIVERSITY PROSPECTING & CONSERVATION IN
THE
DISTRIBUTION OF BENEFITS FROM TRADITIONAL MEDICINES
RECOMMENDATIONS:
· To establish equitable terms of trade
pertaining to medicinal plants and knowledge associated to them.
· Develop benefit sharing models.
·
Increasing value-addition production of phytomedicines at
local and regional levels.
TOPIC
3
3.1 STANDARDIZATION
Development of Standardization
procedures that are adaptable to the
situation(s) at community level to
address the issues of efficacy, safety
and quality of phytomedicines.
In this respect, to also include
capacity building amongst African research institutions.
3.2 RECOMMENDATIONS:
·
To monitor and regulate market forces for sustainable
conservation through recognition and support of traditional medicinal plant
trade.
3.3 Collate, harmonize and increase
awareness of legislation pertaining to Biodiversity
use and related indigenous knowledge systems.
TOPIC
4
4.1 To
facilitate organizational management of traditional medicine health
care systems and official recognition.
4.3 Initiate networking, training and
information exchange and disseminate in
order to achieve complementarity
between the two systems.
*********************************
1. Develop
networking to facilitate regional and international cooperation
in medicinal plants, traditional medicine and pharmacopoeia
research and development and to link up with other
medicinal plant programmes in other region (eg.TRAMIL etc.).
2. All research programmes in traditional
medicine and medicinal
plants
should have a gender component.
3. As a follow up to the workshop convene a
regional meeting in order
to
sensitize interested donors and other international organizations
to the
plan of action in view of possible support and to examine
closely
policy issues in this area.
TOPIC 1
PROTECTION AND CONSERVATION OF
MEDICINAL PLANTS AND TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 8(j)
OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY (CBD)
1.1
IDENTIFICATION, DOCUMENTATION, PROPAGATION AND DATA BASING.
Definition of terms:
Identification - Identification of plants using both
scientific and traditional systems.
Documentation/
Data basing
- All forms of documentation or storage of information such as herbaria,
museums, libraries, electronic information technology, on-form documentation,
etc. and how this information is disseminated to various stakeholders.
Propagation - Domestic and cultivation techniques,
multiplication for commercial use, harvesting and drying techniques,etc.
Main Problem:
n Following the agreement and common
understanding of the above terms, the group identified the main problem. This was defined as follows: “That Medicine
plants are not properly known, documented and conserved.”
Objectives:
n Thus the major objective would be to
properly identify, document, and conserve medicinal plants.
Strategies:
The
group discussed and agreed on a number of strategies that need to be adopted
for the above objective to be achieved.
These are :
n Identify plants with medicinal
properties
n Collect existing information and
generate new information through research.
Such information could be botanical, ethobotanical biochemical,
agromonic, etc.
n Build up data bases as well as publish
research findings and also disseminate to interested parties especially
communities and Traditional healers
n Promote sustainable utilization through
sustainable harvesting techniques including traditional methods as well as
domestication of plants.
n Promote Community participation
Constraints/ Needs:
A
number of constraints were identified that may have to be overcome in order to
implement the strategies. These were:
n Lack of recognition of the traditional
health sector by most governments.
n Lack of capacity in terms of human
resource, infrastructure and financial.
n Gap between traditional and western
knowledge systems
n Traditional healers have tended to
protect information as one way of protecting their rights (IPR), for economic
reasons as well as the sacredness/ secrecy associated with traditional medicine.
n Lock of partnership among stakeholders
i.e. between scientists and traditional healers and also among traditional
healers themselves.
Activities:
n Provide training at all levels,
informal as well as formal
n Promote collaboration between and among
stakeholders
n Promote awareness through education;
lobbying, etc.
n Source funding from Governments,
private sectors, international and regional agencies, etc.
n Promote networking - north - south and
south south
n Implement the OAU initiative on
community property rights.
Main Actors:
The
following actors were identified:
n Communities
n Governments
n Academic i.e. Universities, Herbaria,
museums, etc.
n Traditional Healers/ Practitioners
n Private sector
n Parastatels including National Parks
1.2
IN SITU AND EX SITU CONSERVATION OF MEDICINAL PLANTS
IN-SITU”
Main Problem:
n Over-exploitation
Objectives:
n Sustainable conservation
n Increasing awareness
n Legislation establishment
n Establishment of coordination mechanism
Strategies:
n Sustainable use
n Empowerment
n Capacity Building
n Involvement of stakeholders at all
levels
Constraint/ Needs
n Conflicts in resource management
n Lack of access
n Uncontrolled economic development
n Unsustainable harvesting
n Lack of enabling legislative enviroment
n Conflicting line management
Activities:
n Training (1,5,6)
n Community gardens (1,5,6)
n Workshop (all)
n Exchange visits (1,5,6)
n Media programmes(2,5)
n Policy formulation (1,2,5,6)
n Civil education (1,2,5)
Main Indicators:
n Trained people
n Reports
n # of visitors to sites
n Policy gaezetted
“EX-SITU”
Main problems:
n Over exploitation
n Establishing gene banks is only mainly
for ex-situ situation for species already almost exstinct. The gene bank has
not given the medicinal plants adequate attention, as they should.
Objectives:
n To conserve and protect
n Identify priority species
Strategies:
n Preserve Bio-resources under controlled
conditions
n Monitoring and assessment of wild
populations
n Monitoring of marketed plants
Constraints/ Needs
n Lack of exposure to natural enviroment
n Loss of gene-diversity
n Expensive
n Inadequate expertise
n Inappropriate to Community access
n Lack of mandate by genebanks
Activities:
n Collection of genetic resources (2,3,4)
n Training (1,3,4,5)
n Complement with In-Situ (all)
n Qualitative and quantitive assessement
n Wild
n Market (1,4,6)
Main Indicators:
n Gene-banks
n Plantations
n Increase genetic diversity through
preparation
n Red data list
n Species report
Main Actors:
n Resource users (1)
n Policy makers (2)
n Industry (3)
n Researchers(4)
n NGO’s (5)
n CBO’s (6)
1.3
AFRICAN CULTURAL PRACTICES WHICH ARE SUPPORTIVE OF THE CONSERVATION AND
SUSTAINABLE UTILIZATION OF MEDICINAL PLANTS
Problems:
n One of the causes of the problem is the
erosian of cultural practices due to various factors.
n In turn, the major underlying causes of
this are economic (at all levels)
Objectives:
n To increase the supply of medicinal
plants by promoting useful cultural practices.
Strategies:
n Use community based participartory
research methods to identify existing (and in particular “threatened” cultural
practices) that are supportive of conservation and sustainable utilization of
medicinal plants, e.g. traditional harvesting and propagation methods.
n Focus on potential income generating
and self-sustaining activities.
Constraints/ Needs
n Lack of “self-regulatory” mechanism at
the national level
n Some key stakeholders in the medicinal
plant trade not adequately recognized (e.g. traders and gatherers)
n Lack of coordination between/ among
different stakeholder groups, especially among traditional healer’s
associations
n Need for a national unifying body of
traditional healer organizations and other groups involved in the medicinal
plant trade
n Inadequate recognition of other natural
resource uses and users (i.e. often the same species have many competing and
different uses and users)
Activities:
n Organize/ establish propagation and
distribution programmes at different levels and scales as appropriate (e.g.
Promotion of home medicinal/ nutritional gardens; community-based and
commercial nurseries; large scale propagation efforts by private companies)
n Training programmes to promote useful
cultural practices aimed at supporting local efforts of bio-diversity
conservation/ sustainable utilization
n Public awareness campaigns; information
dissemination to medicinal practitioners and others.
Actors:
n Traditional healers, traders and
gatherers
n Appropriate government departments
(e.g. community forestry; botanical gardens; reserves etc.)
n NGO’s CBO’s
n Commercial sector (e.g. forestry
companies who can afford the costs of cultivating slow growing species)
1.4
MECHANISM AND STRATEGIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF ARTICLE 8j OF CBD/ IPR
Article
8j of the convention on biological diversity of June 1992 states that :
“Subject
to its national legislation, respect, preserve and maintain knowledge,
innovations and practices of indigenous and local communities embodying
traditional lifestyles relevant for the conservation and sustainable uses of
biological diversity and promote their wider application with the approval and
involvement of the holders of such knowledge, innovations and practices and
encourage the equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilization of
such knowledge, innovations and practices.
The
group has summarized the Article 8(j) as addressing three issues:
n Preservation of indigenous knowledge
n Wider application of the knowledge
n Encouragement of equitable sharing of
benefits gained from indigenous knowledge.
Main Problem:
n Unfair exploitation of Traditional
knowledge (violation of IPR)
Objectives:
n Promote and enforce equitable sharing
of benefits arising from the exploitation of Local knowledge
Benefits addressed to:
n Monetary benefits
n Job creation
n Acknowledgment (degrees)
n Conservation and sustainable
utilization
n Accessibility to information
n Technological transfer
Strategies:
n Implementation of articles 8(j)
Constraints/ Needs:
n Inaccessibility to knowledge (Laws
patents, article 8j)
n No government capacity
n Lack of awareness of article 8(j) to
the community, Government, NGO and companies
n Lack of political will.
n Lack of cooperation/ coordination in
the government
n Ownership of knowledge (individual, or
community ) identification of community parameters.
Activities:
n Awareness of Article 8(j) through
education, workshops, community involvement
n Improved coordination - intersectoral
platform
n Policy and legislation, awareness of
policy makers
n Institutional capacity for enforcement and compliance
n Distribution of benefits clear
definition of ownership
n Policy research for implementation
Role and Players
n Politicians
n Government departments
n Community members
n Medicine/ pharmaceutical companies
n Universities
1.5
AFRICAN INDIGENOUS & WESTERN KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS
Main Problem:
n Lack of systematic knowledge &
negative attitudes.
Objectives:
n To promote increased understanding of
the 2 systems
n To promote better cooperation between
the 2 systems
n To promote communication
n To generate knowledge systems and to
change attitudes.
Strategies:
n Promotion of participatory research
n Establish local & regional networks
n Establish schools of indigenous knowledge
& a training programme at all levels
n Develop curricular for existing
institutions.
Constraints/ Needs:
n Policy-reform programme
n Allocation of financial & human
resources
n To promote institutional capacity
n Lack of perceived common concern
n Need for community-based learning
systems.
Activities:
n Identification priority areas &
implement research on traditional knowledge systems
n Source funding
n Policy advocacy
n Development training curricular at all
levels
n Forums, meeting, newsletters,
publications journals (African medicinal plant & traditional medicine
journal)
n Interdisciplinary, regional joint
projects
n Establish schools for training
n Evaluation & monitoring of
activities.
Main Actors:
n Government ministries & depts
n Universities & research
institutions
n NGO’s & CBO’s
n communities
n donors
n private sector
n Traditional healers & traditional
healer organizations
1.6
PERCEPTIONS AND ATTITUDES
Questions:
Whose perceptions and attitudes?
n Community - should know more about
Traditional healers (TH) and Traditional medicine (TM)
Main Problems:
n Stereotypes of Traditional Medicine and
Traditional Healers of the general public, which is typically negative
(perpetuated by the media)
n Western personel never approached the
Traditional healers to see where they consult and what they do
Objectives:
n Get traditional medicine and
traditional healers exposed in a positive way
Strategies:
n Expose traditional healers and Western
personel to each other
n Get Traditional healers and Western
medicine to sit down and talk to each other
n Promote a positive view of Traditional
medicine and Traditional healers
n Researchers and other (media, etc.)
must go to umbrella organization for good Traditional healers
n Need enabling Government and Academic
policy constraints
Constraints
n Bad publicity by the media
n Stagnate stereotypes of 50 years ago
(illiterate)
n Problems of translations and words with
negative connotations such as “witch-doctor” or “cure”
n Need to create understanding of
Traditional healers in the general public
n These workshops, etc. have changed
representations so there is no progress the same players are not coming back
all the time
n Traditional healers need training in
things like the pharmichological and botanical names so they can appropriately
interact with Western medicine (researchers)
n Training of Lecturers to be able to
teach Western medicine about Traditional medicine
n There are some charlatans (not real
traditional healers) especially in urban set ups.
Activities
n Media release
n Conferences
n Newsletters about Traditional medicine
n Workshop with Traditional healers and
Western medicine
n Referal system where Western medicine
have a list of Traditional healers and where they live 50 Western medicine can
refer patients to Traditional healers for community based health care follow
ups
n Educate Western medicine and pharmacy
personel at University about Traditional medicine formal part of Western
medicine training
n Umbrella organizations constituted so
real Traditional healers are consulted (not consultants)
n Traditional healers informed of
workshops and conferences on Traditional
medicine
n In future more Traditional healers and
cross sectional participation in these workshops
n Promote enabling policies
Main actors
n Traditional healers
n Western personel
n Ngo and donors
n Media
n Government agencies, offices, etc. such
as Health & enviroment
n University admin, lecturers and
pharmacutical students
n Researchers
n Conference organizers
TOPIC 2
PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH AND INVOLVEMENT
OF LOCAL COMMUNTIES AND TRADITIONAL HEALERS
2.1 PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH APPROACHES FOR COMMUNITY
PARTICIPATION (CAPITALS)
Main Problem:
n Lack of community participation
Objectives:
n To promote community participation in
research
Strategies:
n To develop and implement participatory
research methodologies (PRM)
Constraints:
n Research not user friendly
n No feed back from researchers
n Lack of community involvement
n Fear of exploitation
n Lack of flexibility and compromise
n Mistrust by Traditional Medical
practitioner on research
n Lack of cultural sensitivity by
researchers
n Poorly trained researchers
Activities:
n Community workshops focused on research
n Preliminary and continuous
consultations with communities
n Training and capacity building to
empower communities
n Identification of problems and possible
solutions in conjunction with community
Actors:
n Researchers
n Traditional healers
n Traditional leaders
2.2. Involvement of communities and researchers (capitals) in
researching traditional and conventional/ orthodox medicine
Main Problem:
n Communities are not given a role in the
initiation of research activities (both for Traditional and Conventional
medicine)
n Communities are used to legitimate
research activities and research institutions to the benefit of researchers and
institutions NOT for the benefit of communities
n Communities are even less involved in
research activities concerning conventional medicine
n Community and individual contributions
to research activities are typically not acknowledged by researchers and
research institutions (there is a lack of respect)
Objectives:
n Involve the community in research and
promote the respect by researchers of the communities when researching
traditional and conventional medicine
n Give the communities the ability to
know and understand the activities of research institutions
n Compensation for traditional knowledge
Strategies:
n Use ethical principals for community
involvement in research activities
n Liaison between traditional and
conventional medical personnel in research activities where there is a true
equitable treatment
n Bring traditional healers into research
institutions to understand and validate the processes there
n Inform traditional healers of research
findings and allow them to review findings before publication
n Identify Who, How and How much
compensation should take place
Obstructions:
n Ambitions of researchers and research
institutions
n Attitudes of western researchers and
research institutions towards Africa (Neo-colonialism)
n Lack of exposure of poor research by
the media and co-researchers
n Poor oversight of research activities
by research institutions and their lack of proper research protocol
n Political tensions which effect
research access
n Lack of gender and cultural sensitivity
by researchers
n Lack of education on the part of local
communities about their rights concerning research activities
Activities:
n Deposit of research data, findings and
reports into a repository for local communities
n Creation of a national research council
and national research policy concerning research activities in countries where
lacking
n Research activities should be
negotiated and contracted for local community involvement (local communities
get a contract)
n Education of local communities on their
rights and ability to be compensated (including the right to say ‘no’ to
researchers)
n Create a platform for continuous
interaction between traditional healers and conventional medicine
Main Actors:
n Local communities
n Traditional healers
n Western medical personnel
n Researchers
n Researchers institutions
n Government structures
n NGOs, CBOs and donors
n Industry
2.3 Validation (laboratory) of Traditional medicine/ medical
preparations and practices (capitals)
REASON
FOR VALIDATION: To confirm the claimed efficacy of the
preparations in Traditional medical practices.
Problems:
n There is need for validation of
Traditional medical practices so that this sector can get rightful place in the
healthcare system
Objectives:
n To establish scientific basis for the
use of traditional medicine
n To promote a wider use of traditional
medicine
n Scientific: repeatable
Strategies:
n To develop acceptable methods to
validate traditional medicine
n To win confidence of Traditional
medical practitioners
Constraints:
n Lack of facilities suitable for
validation of traditional medicines
n Lack of protocols for ethical
procedures
n Lack of legal protection of property
rights
n Lack of information from the side of
traditional medical practitioners on the:
n preparation methods
n collection methods
n posology/ dosages
n constraindications/ Aetiology
n mechanism of action of the preparations
n toxicity/ antidote
n Lack of collaboration among the
stakeholders
Activities:
n Establish and enable anenable
enviroment for exchange of information
n legal aspects
n benefits
n seminars
n workshops
n Protection of IPR
n Collection & documentation of
methods for validation of traditional medical practitioners
n Development of validation methods by
the Traditional healers
n lab
n physic
n clinical
n subclinical
n customary
Main Actors:
n Traditional medical practitioners
n Community/ patients
n Biomedic
n Researchers
n Governments
n Public & private organizations
n NGOs
n Funding agencies
n Students
2.4 Preparation and development of written national pharmacopea
of medicinal plants through involvement of all stakeholders
DEFINITIONS:
Pharmacopoeia:
- Different types in existence i.e. including different types of information and different
modes of development
2
major types can be identified:
n Analytical pharmacopoeia
n very detailed information on the
phytochemical and biological properties
n developed through extensive laboratory
experimentation and analysis
e.g.
includes tissue-level and the “weight of burnt matter/ashes”
n Traditional pharmacopoeia
n based largely on the documentation of
traditional knowledge available on both the biological characteristics as well
as the uses of the plants & support of the information through additional
scientific data
Main Problem:
n Lack of comprehensive/ written
national; pharmacopoeia
Objectives:
n To establish a broadly accessible
pharmacopoeia to assist all those concerned with medicinal plants.
Strategies:
n Starting point!: refer to the African pharmacopoeia developed under the
auspices of the OAU;
n refer to other sources of relevant
information: i.e. existing traditional documents
n devise a multidisciplinary approach in
the gathering/ analysis of information
n national-level coordination of ongoing
activities
n identification of core/ essential data
required
n identification of available resources
(including human, financial, technical/ infrastructural)
Constraints/ Needs:
n Achieving national level coordination:
a challenging undertaking in itself! Many different actors and interest groups
in existence…
n Too many species to be addressed: need
for prioritization!
n Documentation technology/ expertise and
facilities may be inadequate or lacking
n A large amount of information necessary
n Overall: a time consuming endeavor!
Activities:
n Establish a coordinating body/
“steering committee”
n Establish a multidisciplinary research
team.
n Evaluate the OAU pharmacopoeia’s
relevance/ adequacy for the country (e.g. in terms of species coverage;
coverage of the major applications of the various plants)
n Identify and collect key sources of
other relevant information (databases; other pharmacopoeia)
n Convene key actors involved: through a
national workshop/ meeting
n to identify key areas for research
n to agree on and implement the national
work plan
n to set up regional groups
Main Actors:
A. Formal sector organizations/
1. Research institutions/ Universities
2. NGOs with specific objectives;
interests; activities relevant to medicinal plants
3. Community/ state herbaria
4. Government bodies/ parastatals
5. Pharmaceutical companies
6. Hospitals and clinics
B. Specialists/ community members
7. Mothers
8. Traditional healers
9. Ethnopharmacologist/ Ethnobotanists/ Medical anthropologist
10. Medical doctors; nurses
11. Public health workers/ practitioners
(involved in preventive/ primary health care)
12. Botanists/ Taxonomists/ Ecologists/
Agronomist
13. Phytochemists/ Pharmocologist/
Toxicologists
14. “Documentalists”; (information
technology expertise)
2.5 Biopiracy, bio-diversity prospecting & conservation in
the distribution of benefits from Traditional Medicines (capitals)
Main Problems:
n Unequitable distribution and exchange
of benefits from bioprospecting.
Objectives:
n Equitable terms of trade
n Biodiversity conservation
n
Strategies:
n Increase awareness (consumers and
communities)
n Develop negotiating capacity
n Develop benefit sharing models
n Develop multilateral agreements
n Develop incentives for biodervisty
conservations
Activites:
n National, regional and local awareness
campaign (government, public & private sector) economic and financial, -
rights information
n Establish process for assistance -
negotiation and legal
n Survey & analize benefit sharing
case studies
n Review existing legislation and
international obligations and implement policy reform
n Regional Pharmonisation of policy &
legislation
n Green labels and standards in companies
n Pressure groups in communties
n Increase value - added production at
local and international level
n Promote cultivation by local commercial
growers
n Monitoring biodiversity
Constraints:
n Lack of resources - technical,
financial and human
n Trade research and surveys
n Lack of political will
n Community property rights
n Fragmentation of stakeholders (inter
& intra national)
Main Indicators:
n Number of sharing models adopted
n Legislation adopted
n Number of value added (national
enterprises)
n Number of protocals/ agreements adopted
n Number of agronomic practices adopted
n Threatened species registered.
TOPIC
3
STANDARDIZATION PROCESSES
AND PROTOCOLS FOR RESEARCH OF NEW DRUGS AND FOR PRODUCTION OF PLANT DERIVED
DRUGS AND DEVELOPMENT OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE INDUSTRY
3.1 INFLUENCE OF
STANDARDIZATION OF PHYTOMEDICINES ON INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE AND CONSERVATION OF
MEDICINAL PLANTS AND BIODIVERSITY
DEFINITION OF STANDARDIZATION:
Processes involved in
producing a product with reproducible effect and quality
- for efficacy and safety
PROBLEM:
· Exploitation of indigenous knowledge
· Depletion of medicinal plants and biodiversity
OBJECTIVES
To ensure that
standardization procedures take into account the potential impact on indigenous
knowledge, conservation of medicinal plants and biodiversity.
STRATEGY
· Develop methods of impact assessment
· Ensure involvement of traditional healers / Ensure
community-participatory approach at all stages
· Ensure conservation measures that promote
sustainable
CONSTRAINTS:
· Lack of trust
among stake-holders
· Lack of funds
· Lack of suitable models ( methods and tools )
· Insufficient human resources ( in terms of capacity
and indigenous expertise )
ACTIVITY:
· Hold meetings, promote dialogue with and feedback to
communities
· Draw up and agree upon contract or other legal
mechanisms as appropriate ( short and long term )
· Develop or promote existing and new national
legislation of traditional medicine
· Creation / establishment of institutions for development and
standardization of traditional medicine
· Draw up proposals for funding for government bodies
and /or other donors
· Creating income generating activities
· Capacity building involving: Traditional Medical
Practitioners and Researchers.
ACTORS:
1.
Traditional
Medical Practitioners
2.
Politicians and
Governments
3.
Researchers &
Institutions
4.
Funding agencies
5.
Communities in
general
3.2 ROLE AND IMPACT OF MARKET FORCES ON
MEDICINAL PLANT USES AND CONSERVATION


![]() |
RKET FORCE
![]() |
|||||
![]() |
![]() |
||||
REGULATION LAND
TENURE INTERNATIONAL LOCAL
PROBLEMS: §Demand / Supply Imbalances
§Ultimately impact on environment
§ No control over market forces
OBJECTIVES: §To monitor/regulate and organise market forces
for sustainable conservation through recognition
and support of traditional; medicinal plant trade
STRATEGIES: §Draft supportive legislation
§Create national/regional/international regulation
§Regulate market force
§ Encouragement of land provision for medicinal plant
cultivation
§ Small business protection
CONSTRAINTS/NEEDS
§Lack of information
§Lack of capacity
§Lack of co-ordination
§Lack of political will
§Competition
§Poor pricing (standardization)
§Socio-economic factors
ACTIVITIES: §Monitor the market forces and evaluation
§Create awareness
§Create an enabling environment
§Business training : capacity building
§Encourage local communities cultivation at various
levels
through training (e.g.home gardens with both food and medicinal plants)
§Develop ecological medicinal garden as training centres
§Establish nurseries to encourage dissemination
to provide people who want to
cultivate medicinal plants
MAIN ACTORS: §Local communities
§Governments
§Chamber of Commerce
§Botanist/Universities/National Centre for Seeds
(Research Institutions)
§Banks
§Financial Institutions
§Private Sector (plants suppliers both local and
international
3.3 CONSERVATION
AND RIGHTS (TRADITIONAL RESOURCE RIGHTS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROBLEMS
|
OBJECTIVES
|
STRATEGIES
|
ACTIVITIES
|
MAIN ACTORS
|
CONSTRAINTS
|
(Who owns resources and knowledge?)
Lack of ownership of resources
Lack of ownership of knowledge
Survival rights of resources - but not at the expense of people’s rights
|
Ensure sustainable utilisation of resources
Recognition and protection of owners of knowledge
|
Establish status of plants - first at local level and then
national/continental/international
Strategies for conservation of resources in situ and ex situ to
preserve genetic diversity
Use local as well as other knowledge for cultivation and propagation
of plants
Incentives for income generation opportunities at local and then
other levels
|
Situational analysis (health,
demand biological etc) and needs analysis (status of plants) at local and
then other levels
Establish criteria for prioritisation and develop action plans
Identify and allocate responsibilities in terms of activities (in and
ex situ)
Identify gaps and propose activities; include local knowledge
Initiate value added activities at local level and then other levels
|
Researchers and local
interest groups
Local interest groups;
local government/”tribal” representatives; facilitators
All appropriate
stakeholders
Researchers and local
interest groups
Local interest groups and
individuals;technical, social and legal experts;private
|
Multi-national corporations
MAI
|
|
|
|
|
sector.
|
|
|
|
Establish resource use management systems involving all resource
users (co-management)
Integrate different systems of legislation affecting different rights
|
Identify stakeholders and initiate co-management plans. Capacity
building for conflict resolution.
Capacity building at all level and activities
Initiate advocacy process and review legislation and international
commitments under conventions.
Propose legislative changes harmonising different rights.
Implement legislation
|
All community/ resource users
Training institutions; local experts
NGOs, civil society organisations
Experts (eg legal) and government; stakeholders
Government
|
|
|
OBJECTIVES
|
STRATEGIES
|
ACTIVITIES
|
MAIN ACTORS
|
CONSTRAINTS
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOPIC 4
INTEGRATION
OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE IN PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS
4.1 STRENGTHENING
OF TRADITIONAL MEDICINE AND PROMOTION OF COMPLEMENTARITY BETWEEN TRADITIONAL
AND WESTERN MEDICINES (LEARNING FROM SUCCESSFUL EXPERIENCE, EX. ZINATA)
OBJECTIVE:
·Strengthening
of TM Organization
ACTIONS:
· Provincial/district umbrella through organization
· National Association
· Legislation for legal recognition and status
· Independent T.H. Council (by act of parliament,
regulation and governance
CONSTRAINTS/NEEDS:
· Political power play between healer organization
· Public perceptions of T.M.
· Education level of Healers
· Political Will
· Attitudes towards traditional medicine
· Erosion of culture
OBJECTIVE:
· To promote complimentarity between traditional
medicine and western medicine.
ACTIONS:
· Information sharing
· Training of traditional healing in formal education
systems for western doctors.
· Combination of traditional healing and western
medicine at primary health care and clinics level.
· Strong referral system and report back.
· Hospital/clinics for traditional healing.
· Improving professionalism - efficacy of medicine,
hygiene, standardization, training of healers.
· Remove legislative barriers that prevent
complimentarity and create legal framework to allow complimentarity.
· Strong research and development in traditional
medicine.
· Regional co-operation of Healer Associations.
· Needs for joints workshops between traditional
medicine and western medicine.
CONSTRAINTS/NEEDS:
· Continued resistance by western medicine and
traditional medicine.
· Political will
· Negative public perception of traditional medicine
· Lack of respect
· Deceit
· Appropriate legislation
· Equitable sharing of government and donor resources.
MAIN ACTORS:
· Traditional healer Associations
· N.G.O. e.g. Tramso
· Government
· Medical Council (western & traditional
community)
· Universities
· Funding agencies.
4.2 SUITABLE APPROACHES IN THE PROMOTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF
TRADITIONAL MEDICINE THROUGH PARTICIPATORY METHODOLOGIES (LEARNING FROM
SUCCESSFUL EXPERIENCES, EX. TRAML NETWORK)
PROBLEM:
· Isolated efforts among key players
· Non participatory methodologies in the promotion and
development of traditional medicine (top down).
OBJECTIVES:
· Coordination of efforts through participatory
methods for promotion of research and development.
STRATEGIES:
· Insist on community and traditional healer
participations at all levels.
· Prioritization of areas for promotion and
development in a participatory manner.
· Networking of key players
· Delegating specific tasks to specific people.
CONSTRAINTS/NEEDS:
· Lack of coordination among key players
· Lack of media of publication on traditional medicine
in Africa
· Lack of technical expertise
· Top-down approach by donors governments and policy
makers especially WHO
· Lack of uniform professional standards
· Negative attitudes towards traditional medicine by
some institutions.
ACTIVITIES:
· Launch an african journal on traditional medicine.
· Media releases on the aspects of traditional
medicine (e.g. Radio, newsletters, local newsletters).
· Fund raising for community identified activities.
· Development of a regional, clear and timely plan of
action.
MAIN ACTORS:
· All country representatives at this meeting.
· Communities.
4.3 TRAINING AND DIFFUSION OF INFORMATION WITHIN THE HEALTH CARE
DELIVERY SYSTEMS (BRIDGING THE GAP BETWEEN THE SYSTEMS)
PROBLEM:
· Lack of common understanding and communication and
poor co-operation between traditional medicine and western medicine on causes
and treatment of disease.
· Limited integrated approach to health care delivery.
· Prejudices on both sides (traditional medicine and
western medicine).
· Limited training system and resources which
incorporates both health care systems.
OBJECTIVES:
· Provide health care system appropriate to the
community it serves.
· To achieve a complementary/collaborative approach to
health care delivery.
· Promote an understanding and tolerance of the two
world views and learning from one another and promote an awareness of the value
of both systems.
STRATEGIES:
· Set up channels of communication within existing
structures and identify key players.
· Define areas of common ground and needs of the
communities in need of health care and the operating systems (western and
traditional) between all three.
· Inventoring existing resources Chuman,
infrastructure, institutions, plants, organisations, governments, departments).
· Identify gaps.
· Facilitate access to resources.
· Create national training programmes starting at
local levels and then other levels (PHC, Propogation, conservation).
· To achieve government recognition at an appropriate
H.C. ? health community/healer community? System.
ACTIVITIES:
· Meeting of representatives of all relevant
stakeholders to establish plans of action (media, workshop, education material,
etc.)
· Evaluate coping skills and implement better
wage/meet needs (focus at local level first).
Improve institutional systems to avoid ----? And abuse.
· Information dissemination and establish health care
facilities.
· Develop suitable educational materials and develop
further mechanisms and lobby authorities.
NEEDS AND CONSTRAINTS:
· Limited resources (human, infrastructure, etc.)
· In both systems - waste, duplication, abuse, lack of
controlls - no accountability.
· Lack of motivation and political will.[2]
· Lack of consultation within/between institutions and
government departments.
· Lack of clarity about restructuring and agendas
(S.A.)
· Lack of organisation between institutions and
government departments
· Lack of unity between healer organizations.
LIST OF PARTICIPANTS FOR THE REGIONAL WORKSHOP ON MEDICINAL
PLANTS
AND TRADITIONAL MEDICINE
14
- 18 APRIL 1998, CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
|
NAME
|
ORGANIZAT ION
|
ADDRESS
|
TEL.
|
FAX
|
E-MAIL
|
1.
|
Hugo
Van Damme
|
Ngoma
- Tao/NGO
|
P. O. Box 4792
Mbabane, Swaziland/
*P. O. Box 662, 3200
PMB-KSN, RSA
Swaziland
|
(RSA)
0331 442223
|
|
ngoma@alpha.futwonet.co.za
|
2.
|
Agostinho
Bela Adelaide
|
National
Institute of Health
|
P. O. Boxx 264
Maputo, Mozambiqu
|
258-1-
431103
|
258-1
431103
|
aba@malarins.uem.mz
|
3.
|
Siballi
E.I. Kgobetsi
|
Namibia's
Traditional Healers Professional Board
|
P. O. Box 61347
Katutura, Windhoek
|
262360
|
2063806
|
lebeau@iwwn.com.na
|
4.
|
Miss
Cecilia Promise Maliwichi
|
National
Herbarium and Botanic Gardens of Malawi
|
P. O. Box 528
Zomba, Malawi
|
(265)
522893/523388
|
(265)
522108
|
CMaliwichi@unima.wn.apc.org
|
5.
|
Dr.
Nigel Gericke
|
African
Natural Health C.C
|
P. O. Box 937
Sun Valley 7985
South Africa
|
27-21
789 1249
|
27-21
789 1249
|
npg.nbd@iafrica.com
|
6.
|
Rachel
Wynberg
|
Biowatch
South Africa
|
P. O. Box 69
St. James
7946, South Africa
|
788
7677
|
788
9169
|
rachel@iafrica.com
|
7.
|
Phephsile
Maseko
|
Traditional
Healers Organization
|
P. O. Box 3722
Johannesburg, 2000
Cnr 44 Von Welligh & Comm
|
011-331
6933
|
011-331
3185
|
|
8.
|
Brian
E. Morris
|
Resource
Management
|
P/Bag X 11233
Nelspruit, 1200
|
(031)
7594043
|
|
|
9.
|
Shukeri
Kadri
|
Earth
Energy
|
4
Floria Road Wynberg
|
cell: 082 9556797
27-21 762 6159
|
797
1563
|
skadri@yahoo.com
|
10.
|
Thomas
John Bisika
|
Centre
for Social Research, University of Malawi
|
P. O. Box 278
Zomba, Malawi
|
(265)
522 800
|
(265)
522 578
|
csr@malawi.net
or Tbisika@unima.wn.apc.org
|
11.
|
Corn
Alele Amai
|
Natural
Chemotherapeutics Research Laboratory
|
Natural Chemotherapeutics Research Laboratory,
P. O. Box 4864,
Kampala, Uganda
|
256-41
235 932/250 488
|
256-41
530 412
|
camai@uga.healthnet.org
|
12.
|
Danny
Nadoo
|
Department
of Botany - University of Durban-Westville
|
912
Arnleigh, 186 Victoria Embankment, Durban
|
(031)
204 4231
|
(031)
204 4161
|
dannyn@pixie.udw.ac.za
|
13.
|
Ms.
Bucecwa Gloria Mbangu
|
Department
of Environment Affairs & Tourism
|
P/Bag X2
Roagebay, 8012
|
(021)
402 3080
|
(021)
418 2582
|
bmbangu@sfri.wcape.gov.za
|
14.
|
Prof.
Osmund D. Mwandemele
|
University
of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
|
P/Bag 13301
Windhoek, Namibia
|
(264-61)
2063 8900
|
(264-61)
2063 0130
|
odmwandemele@unam.na
|
15.
|
Deborah
Lebeau
|
University
of Namibia
|
P. O. Box 25193
Windhoek, Namibia
Edelvalkst
|
(264-61) 248483 (H)
(264-61)
206 3816 (Off.)
|
(264-61)
206 3806
|
lebeau@iwwn.com.na
|
16.
|
Saka,
J.D.K
|
University
of Malawi
|
Department of Chemistry
Chancellor College
P. O. Box 280
Zomba, Malawi
|
(265)
522 222
|
(265)
522 046
|
jsaka@unima.wn.apc.org
|
17.
|
D.
Albis Anne
|
CNRS
|
12 Glenhof Road, Newlands
Cape Town
|
644
068
|
613
109
|
dalbis@iafrica.com
|
18.
|
Yesetsani
Esao Kambewankako
|
International
Traditional Medicines Council of Malawi (ITMCM)
|
P. O. Box 713
Blantyre, Malawi
|
(265)
623 831
|
c/o
(265) 623 831
|
c/o
MIRTDC
|
19.
|
Chavunduka
Gordon Lloyd
|
ZINATHA
|
40
The Chase, M.T. Pleasant Harare, Zimbabwe
|
332
958
|
-
|
-
|
20.
|
Gillian
Scott
|
School
of Pharmacy, University of the Western Cape, RSA
|
P. O. Box 372
Plumstead, Western Cape 7801
RSA
|
(27-21)
794 6000
|
(27-21)
794 7480
|
gillscot@iafrica.com
|
21.
|
Hellen
A. Oketch
|
Green
Africa Network (Global Renewable Energy & Environmental Conservation
Network)
|
P. O. Box 58396
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2)
717 510
|
(254-2)
717510
|
heoketch@africaonline.co.ke
|
22.
|
Laura
Yeatman
|
DANCED
|
P/Bag X11288
Nelspruit, 1200 S.A.
|
013
755 1674
|
013
755 1678
|
darudec@cis.co.za
|
23.
|
Lionel
GermosJn-Robineau
|
ENDA-Caribe
|
Apdo. 3370
Sto Domingo
Dominican Republic
Carribean
|
(1-809)
535 5450
|
(1-809)
541 3259
|
ecaribe@aacr.net
and enda.caribe@codetel.net.do
|
24.
|
Khungeka
Njobe
|
DACST
Foresight Project
|
P/Bag X 894
Pretoria, 0001
South Africa
|
(012)
314 6480
|
(012)
323 1461
|
fs10@actsl.pwv.gov.za
|
25.
|
Myles
Mander
|
Institute
of Natural Resources
|
Private Bag X01 Scottville
320D
South Africa
|
(0331)
460 796
|
(0331)
460 895
|
manderm@iwr.unp.ac.za
|
26.
|
Rodwell
S. Mwandila Vongo
|
|
P. O. Box 34186
Lusaka, Zambia
|
274
114
|
274114/225
928
|
drrvongo@zamnet.zm
|
27.
|
Mrs.
Guddy Canderly Bajiginywa
|
ELCI
|
P. O. Box 290
Kabale, Uganda
|
(0486)
24441
|
-
|
-
|
28.
|
Monica
Opole
|
Centre of indigenous
Knowledge System & Products (CIKSAP)
|
P. O. Box 66344
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2)
448150
|
(254-2)
444424
|
ciksap@nbnet.co.ke
|
29.
|
Tebogo
Matlhare
|
Thusano
Lefatsheng
|
P/Bag 00251
Gaborone
|
(267)
399 170/1
|
(267)
399170/1
|
fonsag@global.co.za
|
30.
|
Seth
Seroka
|
Traditional
Medical Practitioners Association
|
P. O. Box 7957
Johannesburg, 2000
S.A.
|
(011)
333 6430/333 - 6403
|
(011)
333 3122
|
|
31.
|
Hudson
Jim
|
University
of British Columbia, Vancouver
|
Department of Pathology
Unviversity of B.C., Vancouver,
Canada V5Z 1M9
|
(604)
875 4351
|
(604)
875 4865
|
jbhudson@unixg.ubc.ca
|
32.
|
Francois
Gasengayire
|
IDRC
|
P. O. Box 62084
Nairobi, Kenya
Liaison House, State House Ave.
|
(254-2)
713 160
|
(254-2)
711 063
|
fgaseng1@idrc.ca
|
33.
|
Oliver
Chapeyama
|
c/o
Biomass Users Netwowrk
|
P. O. Box MP16
Mt. Pleasant
47 Northwood Rise
Mt. Pleasant,
Harare, Zimbabwe
|
(263-4)
884 519
|
c/o
Biomas Users Network
|
c/o
Biomass Users Network
|
34.
|
Issac
B. Mayeng
|
TRAMSO
|
P. O. Box 34067
Rhodesgift
7707 South Africa
|
(27-21) 346 142/
959 2190
|
(27-21) 346 142/
959 2704
|
imayeng@pharmacy.uwc.ac.za
|
35.
|
C.K.
Mutayabarwa
|
Institute of Traditional
Medicine, University of Dar es salaam, Tanzania
|
P. O. Box 6746
Dar es salaam, Tanzania
|
(255-11) 171 483/
151 302
Ext. 216
|
(255-11)
151599
|
|
36.
|
Frank
Mgalla Mbago
|
University
of Dar es salaam, Herbarium, Tanzania
|
P. O. Box 35060
UDSM, Tanzania
|
(255-11) 410500
Ext. 2139
|
|
mbago@ucc.udsm.ac.tz
|
37.
|
Mabogo
D.E.N.
|
University
of Yenda
|
P. O. Box 3764
Thohoyandou, 0950
|
(0159) 824 757/
082 202 2906
|
(0159)
824749
|
Emabogo@caddy.univen.ac.za
|
38.
|
Ermias
Dagne
|
Addis
Ababa University
|
P. O. Box 30270
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
|
(2511)
114 854
|
(2511)
551 244
|
eda@telecom.net.et
|
39.
|
Olivier
Marc
|
Sama
Bioconsult
|
27b Rue des 9 Soleils 63000
Clermont-Ferrand, France
|
(33-4) 7390 6055/
9026 0359
|
(33-4) 7390 6055/
9026 0359
|
|
40.
|
Mr.
M.A. Du Toit
|
Department
Water Affairs & Forestry
|
P. O. Box X11288
Nelspruit, 1200
|
(013)
755 1674
|
(013)
755 1678
|
|
41.
|
Karine
Rousset
|
Integrated
Rural Development & Nature Conservation (IRDNC)
|
P/Bag 1050
Neweze, Katima Mulilo
|
(264)
677 2108
|
(264)
677 2108
|
irdncc@iafrica.com.na
|
42.
|
Zemede
Asfaw
|
Addis
Ababa University
|
Addis Ababa University, Department of Biology
P/Bag Box 3434
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
|
(251-1)
114 323
|
(251-1)
552 350
|
|
43.
|
Hareya
Fassil
|
International
Plant Genetic Resources Istitute (IPGRI)
|
Via Delle Sette Chiese 142
Rome, Italy
|
(39-6)
518 92230
|
(34-6)
5750 309
|
h.fassil@cgnet.com
|
44.
|
President
TR/Dr. Pontso Patience Koloko
|
National
Traditional Healers Association of Southern Africa
|
Nthasa P. O. Box 82
Hammarsdale 3700
South Africa
|
(0325)
710 358
|
(0325) 710 358
cell: 083 7289546
|
|
45.
|
Prof.
Charles O.M. Wambebe
|
National
Institute for Pharmaceutical Research & Development
|
PMB 21,
Abuja Nigeria
|
(234-9)
523 1602
|
(234-9)
5231 043
|
wambebe@niprd.anpa.net.ng
|
46.
|
Gladys
Mungai
|
ELCI
|
P. O. Box 72461
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2) 576114/576124/
576154/571718
|
(254-2)
562175
|
elci@elci.sasa.unon.org/
elci@elci.org
|
47.
|
Ernest
Rukangira
|
ELCI
|
P. O. Box 72461
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2) 576114/576124/
576154/571718
|
(254-2)
562175
|
elci@elci.sasa.unon.org/
elci@elci.org
|
48.
|
Ilse
Marks
|
ELCI
|
P. O. Box 72461
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2) 576114/576124/
576154/571718
|
(254-2)
562175
|
elci@elci.sasa.unon.org/
elci@elci.org
|
49.
|
Serge
Dube
|
IDRC
|
P. O. Box 62084
Nairobi, Kenya
|
(254-2)
713160
|
(254-2)
711063
|
sdube@idrc.ca
|
50.
|
Chusa
Gines
|
IDRC
|
P. O. Box 8500
250 Albert St. Ottawa, Ont.
Canada K1G 3A9
|
(1-613)
236-6163 x2562
|
(1-613)
567 7749
|
cgines@idrc.ca
|
51.
|
Rena
Mushavanga
|
Integrated
Rural Development & Nature Conservation (IRDNC)
|
Chetto, West Caprivi Game Reserve
Private Bag 1050
Ngweze, Katima Mulilo, Namibia
|
(264)
677 2108
|
(264)
677 2108
|
irdncc@africa.com.na
|
52.
|
Ticho
Thithota
|
Integrated
Rural Development & Nature Conservation (IRDNC)
|
Bagani,
West Caprivi Game Reserve, Private Bag 1050, Ngweze, Katima Mulilo, Namibia
|
(264)
677 2108
|
(264)
677 2108
|
irdncc@africa.com.co
|
53.
|
Mrs.
Marina Clarke
|
Cape
Technikon
|
P. O. Box 652
Cape Town, 8000
|
(021) 460 3221/
460 3219
|
(021)
460 3193
|
|
53.
|
Sandra
Marais
|
Medical
Research Council
|
MRC - Trauma Research Programme
P. O. Box 19070
Paron
|
(021)
938 0398
|
(021)
938 0381
|
smarais@eagle.mrc.co.za
|
54.
|
Anne
Hutchings
|
University
of Zululand
|
Private Bag X1001
Kwaolangezwa
SA 3886
|
0351
93911
|
|
ahutchin@pan.uzulu.ac.za
|
55.
|
Khadija
Kadri
|
|
4 Flora Road Wynberg
Johannesburg, South Africa
|
(021)
761 4827
|
(021)
797 1563
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment